<body>
Saturday, September 29, 2007

The Vulnerabilty Factor

According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, the word vulnerable comes from the Latin vulnerare, to wound. To be vulnerable is to be "capable of being physically or emotionally wounded." To be vulnerable is to be "open to attack or damage." Every male fictional character I've ever loved has been vulnerable. This includes the cold and deadly James Bond, who once loved a woman (On Her Majesty's Secret Service) enough to marry her and then weep when she was murdered. The vulnerability factor is what makes the "tough guys" of 1920s-40s films, such as James Cagney and Humphrey Bogart, sexy even though they are not the standard "tall, dark, and handsome" of romantic leads. The vulnerability factor is what makes every Gothic hero from Mr. Rochester in Jane Eyre to the vampires and werewolves of modern paranormal, men (and creatures) after a woman's heart. The vulnerability factor is why two pretentious, annoying, pompous male characters such as Frasier and Miles Crane, the social-climbing, psychiatrist brothers on the TV sit-com Frasier, could make us laugh and make us cry. It's why we ached for Frasier, who wanted so much to love and be loved, and cheered when Miles and Daphne eloped in the middle of her wedding. To paraphrase Martha Stewart (yes, I must), when it comes to fictional men -- and real ones too -- vulnerability is "a good thing."

In my own mystery series, I set out to write about a vulnerable woman who was trying to find her way in the world. My character, Lizzie Stuart, is a Ph.D., a crime historian/criminal justice professor. She grew up in a small town in Kentucky, raised by her grandparents. She spent much of her childhood and adolescence trying to live down the reputation of her teenage mother, who left town when Lizzie was five days old. When the series began, Lizzie did not know men, was a bit afraid of them, and not inclined to trust them. Then, on a vacation in Cornwall, England, she met John Quinn, ex-military police officer, big-city homicide cop, a White male to her Black female. The two things they had in common was a nose for murder and a shared determination to find the truth (integrity). But as Lizzie has discovered, Quinn has his own troubled past. It is Quinn's vulnerability that has allowed Lizzie to let down her defenses -- gradually, painfully, but inevitably.

Don't get me wrong. I am not stating a preference for weeping men who wear their battered hearts on their sleeves. I don't like heroes who spend pages sharing their sad stories with the heroines. I like a hero who is complex enough and intriguing enough to draw a strong, intelligent heroine to him. I like a hero who is a puzzle to be solved, a mystery to be unraveled. I like a hero who protects (and allows himself to be protected), and who is brave enough to finally open his heart to love in spite of the dangers. That's how I define the "vulnerability factor."

Some Classic "Vulnerable" Film Heroes:
Humphrey Bogart in Key Largo
Gary Cooper in High Noon
Sidney Poitier and Rod Steiger in The Heat of the Night

Who is on your list of vulnerable heroes, past and present?

Frankie Y. Bailey
Author of the Lizzie Stuart mystery series
http://www.frankieybailey.com/

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Scientists find 5,000-year-old fossil of couple hugging

I know this is kind of old news. Archaeologists in Italy have discovered a couple buried 5,000 to 6,000 years ago, hugging each other. I saw it on Yahoo a few days ago. But, as an author of romance, I found my thoughts going back to the story often. I wondered what could have lead to the couple's death and if they were lovers or family members? Had they died suddenly? Or was this a Romeo & Juliet kind of thing? Could this couple, hugging for all eternity, have ended their lives just so they could be together for all eternity? The thoughts just kept coming. And, of course, so did the story ideas.

For all you writers out there, how often do you find your story ideas coming from real-life events and news stories? And, for you non-writers, have you ever read a book and thought: hey, that sounds like something I've heard in the news?

Sandy :-)



read more digg story

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, January 28, 2007

It’s not all fluff!!!

I recently began the re-vamp of my current work-in-progress. You know, the one I couldn’t write because the original plot sucked? Well, it doesn’t suck anymore! *bg* And I am way past the writer’s block! Wooooo Hoooo!

So, last night, one of Keith's friends read the small, eleven sentence, prologue I’d recently written, and he gave me this look. The who-is-this-woman-I’ve-known-for-12years look. He was shocked. LOL. He said, "What are you writing here?!" Then he started quoting snippets, shook his head and turned to Keith. "You aren't afraid to sleep at night?" ROFL. He then turned to me and said, "I thought you wrote romance novels." Doubly ROFL! Especially after the look he gave me when I told him this was a romance. *eg*

What do you like in a romance? Besides the guarantee of a happily-ever-after, that is. Do you go for the dark, gritty stuff? Or, are you partial to lighter works? Romantic comedies? Romantic Suspense? Dark paranormals? What's your must-have story?

Sandy :-)

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Guest Blogger, Jackie Kessler, Scheduled for Saturday January 27, 2007!

We’ve gotten some great questions so far. If you haven’t sent yours in yet, don’t miss out. Just email it to author [at] Barkevich [dot] com. Unfortunately, you will have to type the address into your email client by hand. My husband tells me there is a way to put a link that will not be stolen by the spam-bandits. Of course, he doesn’t know how to do that. So, I’m afraid you’ll have to enter the email address by hand for now. If there are any techies reading this blog, feel free to comment if you’ve got a solution to this small dilemma. Thanks!

On to other news…

You know how my little directory blurb says something about the Trials, tribulations, and exciting goings on of…Well, I think this next can fall under the trials and tribulations portion of that description. For the last few months, I’ve been stuck. Soul Reavers: Tori has not flowed from my fingertips as is the case with many of my other creations.

Honestly, this has been driving me crazy. I mean, it was fully plotted, right down to the last scene. All I had to do was write the thing. Yet, despite having every scene worked out in my mind, I could not, for the life of me, get past chapter 4. Oh, I sat at the keyboard, all but banging my head against my desk in an effort to move the story forward. I took the advice of my friend to try the scene from a different POV. (This usually works, by the way. It’s what got me past a bout of writer’s block with the manuscript that is currently being reviewed by HarperCollins-Avon.) I even tried some writing exercises. Nothing worked. Nothing! I’d write—uh, drag, kicking and screaming—a couple of words from my writer’s consciousness, then proceed to hit the delete key until I was back at the last sentence I’d typed before the whole block thing happened. Grrrr!

Then, one day it hit me. I hated the current story I was writing. It wasn’t something I would read. The plot, I mean. It was…weak. The hero didn’t have a good enough reason to stay away from the heroin. And, it actually threatened to read something like a soap opera. Gah! Ok, so, nothing against soaps. I just don’t like them. At all. I need a story with some meat. I need true conflict. None of this, if-the-Hero-&-heroine-had-just-communicated-this-whole-mess-could-have-been-avoided-crap. Excuse the language. I just hate, HATE, lame conflicts in a story. And, sorry to say, my current wip had the mother of all lame conflicts.

So, now that I realized the story I was trying to write, was total and utter crapola, I took a long hard look at what should be done to fix it. As much as I tried to avoid the clear-cut solution—who wants to throw away more than 5,000 words—I came to the only conclusion possible. Re-plot the story. As in, start from scratch. As in this story is not working, I-would-not-read-it-therefore-I-cannot-write-it. And, guess what? The flood gates are open, baby! Woooooo Hoooooo! My hero is darker and sexier, no longer the lame-ass who couldn’t see the heroine for the treasure she is just because she doesn’t fit the mold of the future duchess. My heroine is stronger, more self-confident. She has a secret she will guard with her life, and she doesn’t take crap from anyone, least of all darker-sexier-hero. I now have secondary characters that I have already fallen in love with and this story I have going on in my head freakin’ rocks! I can’t wait to get it on paper. Heck! I can’t wait to read it. LOL. That said, I’m off to write a new synopsis and get this story moving. Finally.

Sandy :-)

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, January 11, 2007

I’d like a side of HEA with my Romance please…

There is a heated discussion going on at DearAuthor.com, right now, that has me a little perplexed.

To me, the issue is black and white--a no-brainer. Yet, I’ve seen many comments arguing the opposite. So, for anyone who reads or has read a romance novel, I ask you: When you purchase a book from the “Romance” section of your favorite bookstore, do you fully expect it to have a Happily-Ever-After ending? You know, one where, no matter how seemingly insurmountable their obstacles, the hero and heroine end up together in the end? Neither the hero nor the heroine DIES!!!!

I know I do. When I buy a romance, it’s because I want the love story AND the Happily-Ever-After. As far as I’m concerned, if there is no promise of an HEA at the end of the book, it is NOT a romance. Cut and dry. Black and white.

What do you think?

Sandy :-)

Labels: , , , ,